Forum

The viewing angle in the Live and Custom views in the iOS app is based on that of the Alpha view in the original file. Since the aspect ratio of a computer monitor is rather diffferent than that of a phone screen, I think it is a good idea to be able to change the viewing angle in the app.

Good day, It would be helpfull to have the cold sparlular simulation in future like the flame machine / flame thrower effect. I find the sparkular to be a very good sales tool when doing a presentation to a client. Thanks in advance Jurie

Hi, it would be great if localHost could be used as sACN input source. best regards, Nicolas

Hi Since circuit, dmx address and fixture ID each have a seperate box, the fixture annotations really cluttering up the plot. Especially if you have a lot of fixtures in a narrow space. It would be really handy to have just one box per fixture with all the relevant information within. The box may have the following customization and options: - set the background color independent of the fixture - set the outline color independent of the fixture - get rid of the connecting line between f...

Hello All, Since the introduction of the new color picker for layers, it's for me and lot of users I teach in Trainning course a waste of time to set colors by this way. Could you please return to the old colorpicker one, on Windows for exemple, re-link to the system colorpicker. By this way you can find and retreive your personnal colors on all of your applications, because we are working on multiple software, and the colors chart could be cross-sofware by this way. Thank you

It would be great if there is a mode I can toogle, where the opposite edge of the selection that gets distributed by pulling the corner stays in place. Right now, the left side will also gradually move when I pull the right side (why actually), which makes it hard to cleanly distribute these objects. A second mode to spread out the selection in a kind of 'fan style' from center outwards would be a nice addition.

I would like to be able to skip universes without having to create the universes in between. I cannot create a universe 11 without creating universes 1 through 10 as well, because the patch base needs to be ascending without gaps.  Universe name 1, 4, and 5 is possible, patchbase 1.1-512, 4.1-512, 5.1-512 is not possible unless you would also be creating patchbase 2 and 3. Also, I think it is really confusing that the universe name is used in all the plots, fixture lists, and report...

Hello Capture!  I work a lot with the 3d objects from capture to make a new object. I would like a feature to consolidate the selected objects into one new object removing the existing 'border lines' and making the outlines of the newly created shape into a whole.  Lets say as an example; I have a block and a pipe object connecting to eachother. Instead of grouping them I would like to 'consolidate' or 'merge' them into one object. So that I don't have to group everything and when I export...

I would like you to consider changing the wording on the website to clarify something. I definately got this wrong!  I thought the 1/2/4/Unlimited universe feature would be limited to the visualisation engine. I definately didint realise it would be throughout the software and limit patching for drawing plans.  I've bought a Symphony licence so that when we want to pre-vis a show we can fully patch things, but I've told my colleages to buy Solo licences to work on drawings. They don't need...

Hi!  It would be a good functionality to be able to select also the other possible engines in a fixture. For example, I have 64pcs of Tambora Linear 100 fixtures. They have 2 other engines (rgb and strobe) in addition to the main engine. If i want to be able to use the fixture's pixel mapping capabilities in Capture, I have to manually patch every engine in every fixture and calculate the correct offset for the 2nd and 3rd engine. Now as you select the fixtures and do a sequential patch, i...