Forum

Hi,

Unfortunately your link is broken so we cannot check your comparison.

i found color render bland!,

they're is a problem on black surface, impact is not defined

i hope it'will improove because you have make good job on this upgrade

I have similar feelings.

and bloom effect is missing on render image

Hi,

Regarding the images posted, you may very well find the Polar images more appealing than the Argo images, but the Argo images are more realistic than the Polar images. Capture Polars lighting model was inaccurate and the new model in Capture Argo physically a lot more correct than it was in Polar.

Do also keep in mind you may also need to adjust your atmosphere and exposure settings when migrating projects from Polar to Argo - Argo makes no attempt at modifying your view settings to better match Argo.

it's better quality than polar but i think light output is not many differencied,

light output it's too linear, in reality lens and light output is little "more luminus" , i am forced to set atmosherical contrast to 85% to have contrast on beam, but i don't like atmospherical dynamic, so when i decrease atmospherical constrast it's to uniform.

i am sure if you consider this, render wil be very better

please consider this!

best regards,

Pa

on this martin mac 250krypton / martin mac 301 and Fullkolor

beam of mac 250 hide mac 301 on the truss,

on reality mac 301 will be over mac 250

note the circle output is not hide, and bloom effect it's not present ( it's activated but no take in render )

are you find it realistic ??

Hi,

Regarding the brightness of beams in atmosphere, you can regulate this using the "Atmosphere" setting which works independent of the "Atmosphere contrast" setting. Or have I misunderstood?